Transfer trademark ownership legally in Pakistan. Learn Form TM-23/TM-24 procedures, assignment with vs without goodwill, deed drafting, and tax liabilities.
By Syed Asad Hussain Zaidi · 8 September 2026
Author Note / Last Updated: Updated September 2026 by Syed Asad Hussain Zaidi | Advocate High Court | Senior Corporate, M&A & IP Transactions Counsel.
During corporate mergers, corporate restructurings, private equity acquisitions, or founder buyouts in Pakistan, intangible intellectual property assets frequently represent the single most valuable line item on the corporate balance sheet. Yet, corporate lawyers and business founders routinely execute multi-million rupee business transfer agreements under the mistaken impression that signing a commercial contract automatically transfers legal title to registered trademarks.
Under Pakistani statutory jurisprudence, a private contract does not transfer legal trademark title against third parties or the State until it is formally recorded on the Register of Trade Marks.
Governed by Chapter VII (Sections 67 to 74) of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 (TMO 2001) and the Trade Marks Rules, 2004, the assignment and transmission of trademarks requires strict compliance with statutory deed drafting, provincial stamp duty verification, and official registry filings on Form TM-23 or Form TM-24.
Failing to register an assignment can have catastrophic legal consequences: under Pakistani law, an unrecorded assignee cannot initiate an infringement lawsuit, cannot record the mark with Pakistan Customs for border protection, and risks having the trademark cancelled for non-use.
This treatise provides corporate counsel, M&A practitioners, and enterprise executives with a comprehensive legal manual on structuring trademark assignments, navigating the doctrine of goodwill, and recording title with IPO-Pakistan.
Under Section 67 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, a registered trademark is transmissible by assignment, testamentary disposition, or by operation of law in the same manner as other personal or movable property.
| Statutory Provision | Legal Rule under Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 | Operational Impact | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Section 67(1) & (2) | Assignability of registered and unregistered marks with or without goodwill; may be assigned for all or partial goods/services. | Permits flexibility in corporate asset sales, spinoffs, and IP carve-outs. | | Section 74 | Mandatory recordation of assignment on the Register of Trade Marks. | Assignee must apply on prescribed form; unrecorded assignment deed is inadmissible in court as evidence of title without judicial leave. |
The most critical legal and operational distinction in Pakistani trademark transactional practice is whether the mark is transferred with goodwill or without goodwill (an assignment in gross):
| Parameter | Assignment With Goodwill | Assignment Without Goodwill (In Gross) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Business Scope | Entire business reputation, customer goodwill, and commercial operations transfer with the mark. | Only the trademark sign/name is assigned; assignor continues separate manufacturing/trading operations. | | Public Confusion Risk | Minimal; uninterrupted commercial trade continuity. | High; risks misleading consumers regarding true manufacturer origin. | | Procedural Mandate | Standard application on Form TM-23 / TM-24 with assignment deed. | Mandatory Section 69 Rule: Assignee must apply to Registrar for directions and publish notices in national daily newspapers. |
Under Section 69 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, when an assignment of a trademark is executed otherwise than in connection with the goodwill of the business in which the mark was used:
CRITICAL TRANSACTION WARNING: If corporate M&A counsel structures an asset sale as an "assignment without goodwill" but fails to apply for Section 69 advertising directions within six months, the entire trademark assignment becomes legally invalid and unenforceable under Pakistani law!
A properly drafted Deed of Assignment under Pakistani law must incorporate specific structural clauses to survive registry audit and court scrutiny:
| Clause | Contractual Element | Drafting Significance | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | Recitals & Clear Title | Confirms assignor is sole registered proprietor free of liens, pledges, and third-party claims. | | 2 | Operative Present Assignment | Clear legal wording transferring absolute worldwide ownership rights to assignee. | | 3 | Lawful Consideration | Express recital of bona fide financial consideration paid to satisfy contract law requirements. | | 4 | Schedule of Marks | Comprehensive schedule listing trademark numbers, classes, word/logo marks, and jurisdictions. | | 5 | Warranties & Indemnities | Covenant that marks are subsisting and indemnity against pre-assignment infringement claims. | | 6 | Further Assurances | Undertaking to execute registry filings, Form TM-23/TM-24, and powers of attorney. |
A critical procedural hurdle that frequently blindsides corporate practitioners is Provincial Stamp Duty.
Under Pakistani law, an instrument transferring property—including intangible intellectual property—is subject to ad-valorem or fixed stamp duty under the Stamp Act, 1899 as amended by the respective Provincial Assemblies:
[!IMPORTANT]
Admissibility of IP Assignment Deeds under Section 35 of the Stamp Act, 1899:
> "No instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped."
> Practical Consequence: An assignment deed executed on plain paper or insufficiently stamped cannot be acted upon by the Registrar of Trade Marks nor admitted in court during infringement suits until validated by payment of deficit stamp duty and statutory penalties.
If a Deed of Assignment executed in Lahore or Karachi is executed on plain paper or an insufficient stamp paper (e.g., Rs. 100/- when ad-valorem duty required Rs. 50,000/-), the Registrar of Trade Marks or High Court will impound the deed under Section 33 of the Stamp Act, levying penalties up to ten times the deficient duty before processing the transfer.
To record the assignment on the official register, the parties must submit a formal application to the Trade Marks Registry:
| Step | Phase | Action Required | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | Deed Execution | Execute assignment deed on duly stamped non-judicial stamp paper with witness attestations. | | 2 | Form Preparation | Prepare Form TM-23 (joint application) or Form TM-24 (application by assignee alone). | | 3 | Registry Filing | Submit application with certified copy of deed, affidavit, and statutory fees at IPO-Pakistan. | | 4 | Title Audit | IPO scrutiny officer audits chain of title, validity of stamp duty, and statutory authority. | | 5 | Gazette Notification | Registrar publishes notice of change of proprietorship in the official Trade Marks Journal. | | 6 | Certificate of Recordal | Registrar updates Register of Trade Marks and issues formal Certificate of Assignment. |
The Registry’s Examination Section scrutinizes the chain of title. If satisfied, the Registrar:
A trademark assignment triggers significant tax liabilities and corporate compliance obligations that must be structured carefully:
| Compliance Area | Statutory Governing Rule | Tax / Corporate Obligation | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Capital Gains Tax | Section 37 of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Trademarks are treated as capital assets; capital gains realized on transfer are taxable in assignor's return. | | Withholding Tax | Section 152 / 153 of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | If buyer pays consideration to a foreign assignor, Section 152 withholding applies (subject to tax treaty relief). | | SECP Charge Satisfaction | Section 109 of Companies Act 2017 | If marks were pledged as bank security, Form 26 (Satisfaction of Charge) must be cleared with SECP. | | Cross-Border Forex | SBP Foreign Exchange Manual | Cross-border remittances for acquisition of foreign IP require State Bank of Pakistan banking approval. |
Before executing a trademark buyout or corporate asset transfer in Pakistan, execute this due diligence audit:
A trademark assignment is a high-value corporate transaction requiring rigorous precision across contract drafting, provincial tax compliance, and quasi-judicial registry prosecution. Allowing an assignment to remain an unrecorded private contract strips the purchaser of statutory litigation power and leaves the asset vulnerable to forfeiture.
By structuring assignments with explicit goodwill terms, satisfying provincial stamp duty mandates, and promptly filing Form TM-23 with IPO-Pakistan, corporate buyers can guarantee ironclad, unassailable legal title to their intellectual property.
For strategic assistance in drafting trademark assignment deeds, conducting M&A IP due diligence, or recording title transfers with the Trade Marks Registry in Karachi, Lahore, or Islamabad, contact our Corporate & IP Transactions Practice Group at TaxCalc.pk / Zaidi & Associates.
Legal & Statutory Notice: The information provided in this publication is for general educational, academic, and statutory informational purposes only under the relevant laws of Pakistan (including the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the Companies Act, 2017, and the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001). This content does not constitute formal legal, financial, or tax advice. For specific assessments, consult a licensed Advocate or qualified tax professional.