Legal guide to trademark licensing and franchise deals in Pakistan. Learn Section 70 Registered Users, SBP royalty remittances, and WHT rules.
By Syed Asad Hussain Zaidi · 8 September 2026
Author Note / Last Updated: Updated September 2026 by Syed Asad Hussain Zaidi | Advocate High Court | Professional Tax Consultant
From international fast-food chains opening flagship outlets in Karachi and Lahore to homegrown apparel brands expanding into tier-two cities through local retail partners, franchising and trademark licensing represent one of the fastest-growing commercial sectors in Pakistan.
Commercial licensing allows a brand owner (the Licensor/Franchisor) to scale their market presence, capture nationwide retail market share, and generate recurring royalty revenues without incurring the enormous capital expenditure of opening and managing dozens of company-owned stores. Simultaneously, it allows local entrepreneurs (the Licensees/Franchisees) to launch a business with an instantly recognizable brand name, established operational playbooks, and loyal consumer traffic.
However, commercial execution often outpaces legal compliance. Far too many Pakistani business owners draft informal "Franchise Agreements" on plain paper, neglecting the intricate statutory requirements established by the Trade Marks Registry (TMR) of IPO-Pakistan, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).
Failing to properly structure and register a trademark license in Pakistan carries catastrophic legal consequences:
This definitive 2026 legal and corporate tax guide outlines the essential statutory framework governing trademark licensing, registered user agreements, and commercial franchising in Pakistan.
Before structuring a commercial transaction, parties must clearly distinguish between a License and an Assignment:
| Legal Dimension | Trademark Assignment | Trademark License (Franchise) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Nature of Transaction | Permanent sale / outright transfer of title | Temporary permission / lease to use the mark | | Ownership Status | Assignee becomes the new permanent legal owner | Licensor remains 100% legal proprietor throughout | | Duration | Permanent and irrevocable | Defined contractual term (e.g., 5, 10, or 15 years) | | Reversion Rights | Title does not revert upon commercial dispute | Upon termination, all rights immediately revert to Licensor | | Official IPO Form | Form TM-23 / TM-24 (Recordal of Assignment) | Form TM-28 (Application for Registered User) |
Under the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, the primary statutory mechanism for licensing a registered trademark is the "Registered User" procedure set out in Section 70.
| Step | Phase | Action Required | Statutory Effect | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Step 1 | Agreement Execution | Execute detailed License / Franchise Agreement with quality control covenants. | Establishes commercial terms, royalty rates, and operational territory. | | Step 2 | Joint Filing (Form TM-28) | Submit joint application on Form TM-28 to Registrar of Trade Marks (IPO-Pakistan). | Formally notifies IPO-Pakistan of licensed user relationship. | | Step 3 | Examination & Recordal | Registrar reviews agreement and issues Registered User Certificate. | Recorded in official Trade Marks Register. | | Step 4 | Statutory Shield | Commercial use by Registered User counts legally as use by Proprietor. | Shields registered trademark against Section 73 non-use revocation attacks! |
Many Pakistani companies sign private franchise contracts and never bother registering the licensee with the Trade Marks Registry. This oversight creates two lethal legal risks:
Under Section 73 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, any competitor can petition the Registrar or High Court to revoke a registered trademark if:
Here is the legal trap: If a Pakistani or foreign trademark owner allows an independent franchisee to run all retail operations for five years, but never registered the franchisee as a Registered User under Section 70, the franchisee's commercial use does NOT legally count as use by the proprietor!
A predatory competitor can file a non-use revocation petition under Section 73, prove that the trademark owner has not directly sold goods in five years, and convince the court to cancel the trademark, leaving the entire franchise network unprotected!
When the licensee is formally recorded as a Registered User via Form TM-28 under Section 70, the statute explicitly provides that permitted use of a trade mark by a registered user shall be deemed to be use by the proprietor thereof for the purposes of Section 73 and any other provision requiring proof of use.
Registration at IPO-Pakistan legally anchors the franchisee's retail activity to the owner's title, creating an impenetrable defense against non-use challenges.
Under Pakistani trademark jurisprudence and common law, a trademark is not merely an abstract property right; it is a guarantee of commercial source and uniform quality to the consuming public.
If a trademark proprietor licenses their brand name to a third party but fails to maintain strict, active Quality Control over how the licensee manufactures or sells the goods, the arrangement is deemed a "Naked License":
If a trademark loses its distinctiveness due to uncontrolled naked licensing, competing merchants can petition the High Court to invalidate the mark under Section 14(1)(a).
To prevent naked licensing claims, every Pakistani agreement must contain explicit, enforceable oversight mechanisms:
When a Pakistani enterprise acquires a foreign franchise (e.g., from the United States, United Kingdom, or UAE) and remits royalties abroad, the transaction is governed by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Foreign Exchange Manual (Chapter 14).
Historically, Pakistani banks could not remit foreign exchange abroad for royalties without cumbersome prior approval from the SBP or the Board of Investment (BOI). While the SBP has introduced automated facilitation through Authorized Dealers (commercial banks), strict regulatory ceilings apply:
* Certified proof of trademark registration at IPO-Pakistan (or the foreign home country registry); * Audited financial certificates from a Chartered Accountant certifying the net sales calculation; * Proof of payment of applicable federal and provincial withholding taxes.
Franchising transactions in Pakistan are heavily scrutinized by tax authorities at both the federal (FBR) and provincial (PRA, SRB, KPRA, BRA) levels:
| Tax Authority | Tax Head | Statutory Rate & Scope | Compliance Mandate | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) | Domestic Royalty (Sec 153) | Applicable corporate/individual withholding rate. | Section 21 disallows expense if WHT not withheld. | | Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) | Foreign Royalty Remittance (Sec 152) | 15% standard gross WHT (reduced to 10%–12.5% under applicable Double Tax Treaties). | Requires Certificate of Tax Residence (TRC) from foreign franchisor. | | Punjab Revenue Authority (PRA) | Provincial Sales Tax on Services | 16% on gross franchise fees, technical advisory fees, and royalties. | Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012. | | Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) | Provincial Sales Tax on Services | 15% on gross franchise fees and royalty billings. | Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011. |
Under Section 21(c) and (l) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, if a Pakistani business pays a royalty fee but fails to deduct and deposit the statutory withholding tax into the government treasury, the FBR disallows the entire royalty expense as a tax deduction, artificially inflating the company's taxable profit and triggering punitive penalties!
A major area of litigation in Pakistan involves provincial sales tax on services:
A comprehensive Pakistani franchise contract drafted by an Advocate High Court should contain clear contractual protections:
Disclaimer: This guide is prepared for informational and commercial planning purposes. Trademark licensing, foreign exchange remittances, and cross-border tax withholding involve complex statutory compliance. Consult an Advocate High Court or corporate tax specialist for formal legal representation.
Legal & Statutory Notice: The information provided in this publication is for general educational, academic, and statutory informational purposes only under the relevant laws of Pakistan (including the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the Companies Act, 2017, and the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001). This content does not constitute formal legal, financial, or tax advice. For specific assessments, consult a licensed Advocate or qualified tax professional.